KIA Illuminated Adepts
/ Network / Wiki / Forum / FAQ /
Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Ariadne :: Blog

July 16, 2008

A good bit embarrasing for a carpenter*chuckle*

 

A few items, first, to give context; My time at home is spent in the 'yard'. I go indoors, if needful or feel like doing so. It is a shelter, useful in heavy rain, or to sleep, though I am often to be found sleeping in the yard (oftimes in the roomy tent), with one or all of three dogs aside me, (and me covered in misquito repellent, if not in the tent, lol). I have a small camper trailor, and rent the property and a larger trailor. This larger trailor and the source of my current injury, became over the years a storage area. (for awhuile I did not live here, but kept the place.) In the hallway of this place was a hole in the floor that I ignored; I walked over it. I did not fix it. (deliberate not so blind spot?)

 

Yesterday afternoon, this bit of 'reality' and I met closely, intimately. LOL  Me left leg all the way to me arse did go thru the floor and the leg through the piping underneath. After everything stopped moving, and I ascertained that nothing was broken, merely bruised and torqued,   I laughed at meself, here I am , a carpenter stuck up to hir arse in the floor of an area of hir own lair!

 Needless to say, a bit sore, and lesson learned *chuckle*

 

>^ ^

>~ ~

>>.

-<<<<<~ 

Keywords: Lessons, Reality

Posted by Feather | 1 comment(s)

July 10, 2008

Rupert Sheldrake at Alternatives, St James 7/8/08

Rupert Sheldrake’s overview of his Morphic Resonance theory, started with the best summary of the history of western metaphysics I’ve ever heard, focusing on the  basic dichotomy of Eternity vs Change (aha, Apollo and Dionysos I thought). It certainly sharpened my understanding. He began with the Greeks who prioritised Eternity over all else, by argueing for an unchanging essence that underpinned and ordered everything. This possibly began with a mystical experience of a timeless realm he argued, but suggested this was a fundamental error which he sought to correct. Firstly Pythagoras had claimed number and mathematics was the basis of Eternity, the fundamental root of all being, existing in an ideal realm outside Space-Time. This was expanded on by Plato, who stated that everything had an eternal, perfect archetype, or blueprint, that existed in the same abstract, ideal realm as mathematics, giving it its form (thus there was one ideal horse-form, for example, which shaped all imperfect, real horses). A very conservative form of idealism, which emphasised the ‘normal’ and ‘perfect’, and created hierarchies of ‘natural perfection’. He then pointed to the Greek opposition to this stance, typified by Heraclitus, which said the only thing eternal was Change itself, as everything was in flux and diversity the norm. But observed that even Heraclitus had argued that there was a stability to reality, ordered by the Logos, in that everything moved in eternal cycles, repeating themselves over and over in a constant pattern, like the seasons (the classical Pagan or Dionysian view?). Thus even here the ideal of Eternity was still paramount, and maintained by the Logos, the eternal Word, or Law of Nature. Plato argued the Logos was guided by the archetypal Forms, which were all aspects of one Absolute Form, the Good (the ‘solar’ centre of the cycles you could say), and that Change, or ‘chaos’ as he saw it, was a mere drift away from perfection and order, and so an ‘evil’ to be opposed. Heraclitus thought the opposite but was marginalised in Greek thought. He only briefly mentioned Aristotle, the other great Greek idealist, who differed from Plato only in the more liberal view that the ideal Forms were somehow within Nature not outside of it, and that Change was a fine tuning towards gradual perfection, but still maintained the hierarchy of perfection and the faith in the ideal. An important minority view was that of the Atomists, typified by Democritus, who argued that only Matter was eternal, and consisted of particles or atoms, which randomly combined, uncombined and recombined according to geometrical rules, and that Change was merely this random ordering.   

 

Sheldrake then contrasted this with the Jewish ideal of Progress, the idea that there was not some preordained perfection but rather a perfection was something in the future that we move towards, and that Change was the norm that made this possible. This was realised by the wandering nature of legendary Jewish history and search for the promised land. He prefered this but pointed out that then as now, the ‘promised land’ was full of Palestinians, and so preconcieved ideas or goals rarely worked. He then explained how Christianity emerged as a fusion of the Greek and Jewish ideals under the late Romans. Here the Logos and the Absolute Form became aspects of the Mind of the Jewish God. Progress arrived as God’s plan, but Eternity still ruled. The ideas of Plato and Aristotle were thus Christianised. However with the collapse of Imperial Rome superstitioned reigned (Note: The Father, Son and Holy Ghost of superstition could be regarded as Jehovah, Absolute Form, and the Logos of earlier philosophy, but Sheldrake didn’t state this).

The most important factor was the return to centre stage of Plato, Aristotle in the Rennaissance, as well as the new  popularity of Democritus and his Atomism, which was linked to the concept of Individualism and social organisation. But it was not until the Reformation that the Jewish concept of Progress was really absorbed he suggested, and with it came the idea of Evolution. Then experimental Scientific Philosophy began and these three ideas became merged in various combinations. Francis Bacon took this idea up and essentially began the Enlightenment and Modern Science, but he and his later followers, Newton and Wren, were all Pythagoreans or Platonists at heart. These positions were based on habits of thought however not reason Sheldrake argued. Bacon’s greatest practical innovation however was said to be the systematisation of experimentation. Bacon also argued for a process of Social Evolution, believing that Change was the rule in the Human social order, as was demonstrated by History, but that Nature was eternal and fixed. It was goverened by the Laws of Nature, which as a lawyer, Bacon described legalistically. Sheldrake regarded this as anthropomorphic, qouting C S Lewis who said ‘this makes a falling stone a man, and even a citizen’.

 

This was followed by a history of the triumph of the Evolutionary paradigm in Science. At first simply seen as a social phenomena, Darwin expanded it into Biology and lifeform development, drawing on Social Theory, but maintained that Nature itself was fixed. Then Einstein demonstrated the Universe was expanding, but added a ‘fudge’ called the Cosmological Constant to maintain an eternal stability. This has shown to be false he claimed, and has been replaced by the idea that the Universe itself is evolving like an organism. Once thought to be running down into heat death, it was now seen as expanding constantly and evolving. Darwinian concepts are being deployed to explain this. However Matter was seen as eternal for a long time, as were ‘constants’ like Position, but Quantum Mechanics demonstrated this was not fixed either and was all a state of flux. But still Eternity was retained in the basic Laws of Nature. Sheldrake suggested that, given the trend this would go as well, and the Laws of Nature would be seen as mere habits, as Eternity was a myth.

 

This was where Morphic Resonance fitted in, as the mechanism of all evolution, from the Laws of Nature, to Lifeforms, to Mind and Memory. The general idea being that everything was linked into one big field on all levels, Nomological, Material, Cosmical, Biological, Social, Mental and Psychological. All ordered forms in this field were just habituated patterns, or impressions in it, based on nodes of force resonating with each other. It was these habits that had not only created the illusion of Eternity, but the illusion itself had become a habituated thought pattern, like all thoughts and ideologies.

 

His argument for Cosmological Morphic Resonance was to ask scientists if the Laws of Nature existed before the Big Bang and the formation of the Cosmos, if they say yes then they are Platonists, who believe in unprovable or unfalsifiable, non-scientific elements,  and if they say no, they either believe all the Laws of Nature miraculously came into existance at the Big Bang (including Laws effecting things not then existant), or that they evolved with the Cosmos. He likewise tackled Quantum Physics by suggesting the Multiverse contravened Ockham’s Razor, and that its supporters such as Lord Rees, the head of the Royal Society agreed, but had said it did away with God and the supernatural. In contrast he proposed a Resonant Quantum Mechanics (perhaps like Decoherence Theory?). He then outlined how Morphic Resonance made Genetics redundant, or at least as nothing more than a protein factory for producing the building blocks that Morphic Resonance organised. Evidence for this was the insuffient genetic difference between species, given the complexity and diversity of life. Furthermore he argued the brain functioned by connecting resonant ideas, and particularly that memory was a resonance between past and present mental states (and possibly even future states). Even our personal identity was a resonance between our current awareness and past memories. ESP was a resonance with others according to how well the subjects were atuned or alike. Group psychology and herd formation was another kind of socio-cultural resonance. But most controversially he suggested the mind was extended outside the body as part of a universal field of which we were all part, drawing parallels with Jung’s Collective Unconscious. Even suggesting that personal memories were stored here and not in the brain, which was just a tuning device. His evidence for his memory theory drew on Pribram’s holistic mind theory and research that showed an octopuses memory was everywhere in its brain, but nowhere in particular, and how bits of the human brain could be removed without memory loss. His extended mind theory draws on his ESP experiments.

 

Other anecdotes he put forward were that if Morphic Resonance were true, things learnt by other minds would spread, the much contested hundreth monkey effect. But gave evidence for this in the form of the mystery of the increasing ease of IQ tests. He even argued exams could be easier by answering the questions in reverse order, so the earlier answers tackled last will already have been answered by many others. He even suggested testing  this in an experiment with  head  of exam board.


When asked if he had a metaphysical philosophy that explained how all this worked he said no, but suggested that the philosophy of Kashmir Shivaism was interesting (curiously as this is also an influence on Neo-Dionysian thought).

 

I was very impressed by his presentation though noted he underplayed his experiments that haven’t had good results and was sceptical of his claim that Morphic Resonance was behind every ordered phenomena at every level! A good idea become obsessive or the greatest discovery of all time? Either way I think he’s closer than most others to science of the future.    

Posted by Kao23 | 2 comment(s)

July 06, 2008

I just took two quick shots from my window:

 

 

They are gonna play marches out there as often as they can until tuesday. The big parades are gonna take place in front of my window. It's the Schützenfest! The same festivity every year where everything looks exactly the same every year, everything sounds exactly the same every year and which makes me almost lose all sanity every year because of the fucking marches. What you see there is not real military but ordinary people who for some reason wear uniforms . They are doing that because they have always done so every year in the summer. They even have a king and a queen. The king gets his title by shooting at a wooden bird with a gun. Surprised There's never as much drunken yobbishness happening on the streets as when it's Schützenfest. These people must assume that everybody in this place enjoys it the way they are doing it, as loud as they are doing it and with all the limitations for traffic. In a few minutes the first parade will start which is gonna go on for several hours. I hope I don't lose my mind.

Just added this for an even better impression:

Posted by Zeitl0ch | 1 comment(s)

June 27, 2008

Hmm, what will the Japanese come up with next?

When I first heard about Realdolls a few years back, I figured it would only be a matter of time before they started putting robotics in them.  Well, as far as I know they still haven't, but I have just heard about AI Robotics, a Japanese company that has started to make androids.

They are currently taking pre-orders for Perfect Woman, (I wonder how much feminist backlash they will face?) a female android that can apparently be taught to clean and cook (would you trust it?)  Can they be taught to kill? (Scary prospect).  I don't know if Perfect Woman has the same kind of sex enabled technology as Realdoll, but if it doesn't, its only going to be a matter of time before the two technologies meet...

Aside from the films Stepford Wives, Bladerunner and AI coming up in my head as I think where this is heading, I'm also thinking of the magical possibilities of these things.  If they really can clean and cook and perform other household chores, then I can see it won't be long before every household has one, or two.  Thoughts of the Matrix and Terminator also come to mind at this point.

But by the time they are in mass production, using them as a physical basis to house servitor spirits may become and attractive prospect.  After all, the ability to build slave lifeforms that did the sorcerors bidding was largely what the creation of homunculi was all about.

One last thing, for the heterosexual woman and gay men of you, apparently a male version of the android will also be available soon.  I wonder if they'll make it look like Data.  I dare say some will dress them up that way if they can... Wink

Keywords: ai, android, bladerunner, funny, humour, japan, lisa, realdoll, robot, stepford wives, technology

Posted by Anton Channing | 0 comment(s)

June 17, 2008

Thanks a lot for your opinions on the goat pics. 

I quickly proceeded in doing the proof reading and layout for "Prometheus´ Tod" so it seemed likely to already design the cover as I was once logged in to my publishers´ server today. I uploaded all files for the book today which means that it should be available via Amazon and bookstores in about three or four weeks. For some reason Baphomet in his 'revolting' pose with a red background kept popping up in front of my mind's eye so I decided to make this the cover design. I think it looks quite cool. All logged in users can have a look at a preview of the book cover which is in PDF format here: http://network.kiamagic.com/zeitl0ch/files/-1/29/preview_10194516_27148_cover_5b2213a470.pdf

Do you like it? Sorry for most of you that the book will be in German. Anton has already asked me once about translations. At the moment I lack contacts to foreign publishers and the next obvious step for me will be to try and trigger some public interest in Germany first. If the book can find an audience I might see if my publisher can help me with an English translation. I know Feather speaks a little German and maybe somebody else of you does, too. If you think your German is good enough to read a German novel, maybe you can find a way to purchase it outside Germany (perhaps via Amazon). At least my first book "Zeitlochs ewige Abenteuer" is being advertised on a Japanese page as I saw.

Keywords: author writer novel devil prometheus baphomet goat

Posted by Zeitl0ch | 0 comment(s)

June 10, 2008

Soon I will publish my novel "Prometheus´Tod". I decided I wanted a goat on the cover because in the book the story is told by the devil. I recently saw a perfect goat at the "Kinderbauernhof" ("children's farm" - something like a small zoo with farm animals) near where I live. It had a very thick beard and a lot of fur, seemd to belong to another race than the typical middle-european goats. Today I went there with a camera but the pen where I had seen it was empty. So I had to take photographs of some other goats I found. I guess that special goat could be back on sunday when the most visitors come. I think I'll go and take another picture of that one, then. Now I want to set up a little contest on which goat will be the one for the cover. I would like you to comment on them like the jury in "Idol" or "Next Top Model". Because I am Occulture's only true equivalent to Heidi Klum (she hosts "Germany's Next Top Model" - OK, I might not be married to Seal, but to seven of them instead, HarHar!) and because I am the one who will publish the book I reserve the right to comment myself and to make the final decision. However I am willing to seriously consider your opinions and I think it would just be fun playing the jury. OK?

Here's the first candidate:

LILLY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hello Lilly! Lilly, you're very young aren't you? I have the impression the camera still scares you a little. You didn't want to look at the photographer, did you? Now, Lilly. We're seacrhing for a DEVIL, you see? I have the impression you're just a little too fluffy and white and cute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well, but I have to admit, Lilly, that at your second attempt you developed your very own way of being creepy. So you get some of my respect for that. But I am still not sure if this is the kind of devil we want. OK?

Next One:

PAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, Pan! You step in front of a camera convinced that you're a professional. You have the greatest self esteem of all candidates. But I think the only postive thing I can really say about the picture is that you seem natural. Let's look at the next one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here we can see your self esteem and vanity again, but the pose is not quite what we wanted to see. You think you're beautiful but I think you lack anything demonic and that is what we need. Alright? Sorry, but I don't think you're gonna make it.

And last but not least:

BAPHOMET

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baphomet, I say it openly, you're my favourite! The expression of revolt you show here tells us you're the one who really gets the idea of being the devil. You show so much passion on that photograph it's just unbelieveable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baphomet, you know what you're doing. Just bluntly showing off your pentagram shaped head like this is what we need here. If we digitally improve that picture a little this could really be the one. There's just one thing about you that bothers me a tiny little bit. We'll see it on the next picture, too...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The problem I see is that despite your apparent age and experience you still don't know what to do with your ears. First the right ear goes down and then the left ear goes up. I am not yet sure if this will be a problem. We'll see...

Posted by Zeitl0ch | 7 comment(s)

May 22, 2008

Just published my latest serpent blog entry, The Race Myth

Keywords: adam, even, genes, genetics, home sapien, human, human origins, origins, race, racial

Posted by Anton Channing | 0 comment(s)

May 13, 2008

I have just agreed to become a staff writer for key64.net and to celebrate I've just written my first article there as staff.  Of course I once used to be a regular contributor of the old site, key23, and I had one article published by key64 already, but it still feels special to me, so I'm mentioning it anyway... Wink

So this first article is Know Thyself, and it is somewhat of a expansion upon a central theme to my blog Sorcery and Comfort.

Keywords: apollo, delphi, discovery, key64, know, knowledge, self, thyself, yourself

Posted by Anton Channing | 0 comment(s)

April 26, 2008

The Spear of Destiny (23rd April)
Treadwell’s Bookshop, Tavistock St W1 (www.treadwells-london.com)

This was one of the most interesting talks I’ve yet attended at Treadwell’s. The last in a series of five by the scholar James North on Hermeticism in the English Renaissance / Tudor period.

The series dealt with Anglican Christian Cabbalism and Pythagoreanism from John Dee to Francis Bacon, leaning heavily on ciphers and numerology, often centred on the numbers 17 and 19, particularly in Shakespearean prose. Some of which seemed more than just pattern recognition. Inthe final talk for example he revealed the secret Shakespearean numbers 23 and 46, linked not only to his birth/death dates, but also Psalm 46 (the 46th word of which is ‘shake’ and 46th penultimate word is ‘spear’!).  It also linked this to Rosicrucianism and the mystery of the Rho (17) and Tau cross (19). Note, all these root numbers are Primes, hinting at a Neo-Pythagorean revival with a more advanced symbolic Maths (Bacon’s influence?).


The final talk focused on English occult politics and St George.

The essence of this was the thesis that during the increasing religious split in Europe,
first between Rome and the Holy Roman Empire, and then between Catholicism and Protestantism, a movement towards Christian reunification began to grow, alongside a
more general reformism (with opposition to all dualistic factions) and return to Christian origins. Central to this movement was Christian Cabbalism (with its own agenda of a Christian and Judaic reunification) and Alchemical Hermeticism (with its synthesis of  Christian and Pagan themes), operating both independently and within Christian mystical circles within the Churches. This intensified with the rejection of the emerging puritanical forms of Protestantism, but more especially with the increasing perception of the Catholic Church as an ‘evil empire’, with worldly rather than spiritual interests and ambitions. This culminated in the shockwaves that followed the Saint Bartholomew’s Day Massacre of the Huguenot Protestants by the Catholic powers in France. At the core of this movement lay various secret societies, at the forefront of which were the occult orders of the age. The movement however was not itself a unified ideology but was rather a tradition, or system of principles, with various interpretations.
Shortly after this the ‘miraculous’ defeat of the Spanish Armada by the English,  who saw it as ‘Divine Intervention’ against the ‘Satanic’ Catholic Empire, revived the natural inclination of the British to see themselves as the ‘chosen people’, and the reformist wing of the Tudor Elizabethan establishment thus became the foremost champions of this movement.

Central to the British mythos was the image of the twin pillars, with a ship sailing between  them, popularised by its official ‘sea magus’ John Dee. Initially this was a symbol of the Pillars of Hercules passed through on the ‘journey to Atlantis’ or new land, but it also came to be regarded as the pillars of the Temple of Solomon, understood as the pillars of the Tree of Life. This became the central image of reunification, with the pillars representing everything from heaven and earth, to the ideologies that required reunification, to the projected political powers of Europe and America. All of which were part of a kind of magical dialectic which became the master formula for all theory and practise. The image was inherited by many orders, but most famously by the Freemasons who interpreted it in their own way. The ship that mediated the pillars was often forgotten, but was traditionally associated with Britain. The speaker emphasised the multiple meaning of symbols and their context dependency.

Britain’s importance was traditionally rooted in the Glastonbury Grail tradition, which via the Arthurian Mythos dovetailed with the reformative neo-chivalric fashion of the period, and the legitimising  Tudor Celtic Revival.  As it was St George’s Day special emphasis was placed on the role of the Order of the Garter and its central myth of George and the Dragon.

This British tradition was also appeared diverse, incorporating everyone from the elitist British Imperialists, through Shakespeare’s esoteric patriotism, to William Blake, with his libertarian visions of a New Jerusalem and the Marriage of Heaven and Hell.


The English Draconic tradition then formed the bulk of the rest of the talk. With the Dragon or Serpent typified as the Tellurian, Chthonic or Lunar power and St George as the archetypal, earthly manifestation of the Heavenly or Solar power, formerly known as Apollo (the slayer of the Delphic Serpent). Mythically this was also seen as the interaction of Apollo and Diana, or the Divine Feminine. Later in the question period St Michael was added as the more celestial form of Apollo who battles the Draconic Satan in defence of the Divine Feminine. A crucial point here was not only are the Serpent and Dragon significantly different but in themselves depend on context for meaning. The fixated ideas that the Dragon-Serpent represented instinct and femininity and Apollo represented reason and masculinity were common cultural distortions. Symbolism it was explained could be easily misinterpreted by undeveloped or narrow minds, with Wagner the classic example. Similarly the idea of a dualistic conflict between these two was also rejected in favour of mutually modifying dilectic and union. Early depictions of George and the Dragon showing a subduing rather than a killing. The Serpent was depicted in general as a feminine force but also a symbol of wisdom as well as earthly forces, while the Dragon could be a force of fertility and prima material, or a celestial power of destruction cast down into the Earth, like Typhoon (whose name meant swelling and excess).  Apollo’s name also meant ‘destruction’ however. There was a sense of Taoism in all this.A major historical error was the use of such Typhoonian powers through their enslavement to divine forces, the origin of the Grimoire tradition. This reflected a mentality of the ‘ends justifying the means’.

This was expanded on by reference to Zoroastrian notions of dualism, involving the liberation of the positive forces of the Earth  (from the Darkness and Fixation of Ahriman)  and its union with the positive forces of Heavenly Light.  Thus the Spirit penetrated and illuminated the Earth, and Darkness, which only had a negative existence anyway, vanished.  This negative non-existence, of Darkness and Satan was compared to abstractions and illusions, like false beliefs and the bad credit that was currently plaguing the economy. Money itself (and perhaps commodification?) was also described as illusional, a kind of occult version of the Spectacle? Francis Bacon was evoked as a Hermetic Scientist who sought to illuminate material ignorance in a similar way. 


In addition to this Indian Kundalini Yoga and Tantra were deployed to shed further light on the Draconic Solar-Lunar dualism and the wisdom giving powers of the chthonic Serpent.


I felt this might have been stretching credulity a bit, and projecting modern occult concepts into the past, however some curious supporting examples were given, such as the symbolic resonances of the name of the Grail achiever Percival with ‘Parsee (Zoroastrian) Fool’ and ‘Pierce the Veil’. This was more convincingly backed by associating this with Elizabethan literary references, which used sexual innuendo in its talk of  the spear and its bearer, with its magical potency and power of penetration. There were also references to the wounded king and his blood, closely related it seemed to the blood of the menstruating woman and the wounded Dragon. All of which had the power of magical renewal. An interesting image was referred to which saw the contending horizontal forces of the Solar and Lunar powers turning a vertical axis in a spiralling motion. Arthur was related to the Great Bear, and the Pole Star, the guardian of this axis. All of which was suggestive but not conclusive.

Ending on light relief with the notion of Stella Artois as a kind of spiritual nectar, and Tony Blair as some form of anti-christ figure creating a secular version of these mysteries, that combined the worst aspects of political and religious dualism, the speaker brought the series to an end.

The talk was well received and most were sympathetic to the theses, with one criticism being the interesting comment that the ‘evil dragon’ was sometimes more attractive for ‘outsiders’ in rebellion than the Christian ethos of this Rosicrucian thesis. But the speaker had already stated that he was in many ways playing ‘angel’s advocate’ and was not necessarily supporting the cosy English Cabbalism of his historical narrative.

Likewise I wondered how the dissident ‘School of Night’ fitted into this thesis, a recalcitrant left hand path tradition? And from my own favourite paradigm, remembering James North’s earlier talk on Orphism and Dionysos, wondered where the Dionysian fitted into the equation. Perhaps as an alternative to the Dragon, given the Seven Headed Dragon form sometimes attributed to Bacchus, and Nietzsche’s Apollo – Dionysos opposition (also found in Robert Fludd’s work, which saw Apollo as Light and Dionysos as Darkness). Or given the late Greek identification of Apollo and Dionysos at a deeper level, in a more Orphic interpretation which would equate an androgynous Dionysos (often depicted in a boat) with the intermediary between Solar and Lunar, and the ship between the pillars.

Posted by Kao23 | 0 comment(s)

April 21, 2008

Reflections Beneath A Dark Sun: Myth, History, Politics and Paganism
Treadwell’s Bookshop, Tavistock St W1 (www.treadwells-london.com)

5  Neo-Nazi Mysteries (8th April)

This penultimate talk was a familiar exploration of Goodrich Clarke’s research into Fascism within contemporary Occultism. I missed this due to other commitments but it is something I’m already quite aware of. Those who attended reported it was of some interest and highly informative for them.

 

6. On the Spirit of Terrorism (15th April)

The final talk in this series tackled terrorism and Islamism through the philosophical lens of maverick French philosopher Jean Baudrilard, whose philosophy, some say, claims that in post modern society the image and the media have become so dominant that the ‘map’ has replaced the ‘territory’. In fact reality according to Baudrilard has been demonstrated to be evasive and ambiguous and essentially unknowable. All that

is left for a stable environment it seems is the conventional system of interlinking symbols we call culture. This ‘hyper-reality’ was however an empty shell that could collapse at any moment leaving us nothing. Or so some have interpreted the message of  the opaque, radical semiotics this post-situationist provocateur.   

 

Alexander unashamedly became a mouthpiece for the controversial views of this provocative intellectual, summing up his series with the extreme viewpoint that, regrettably, fascism was now the only dynamic voice in politics, given the weak liberalism, groundlessness and uncommittedness of the post modern West. Looking for a radical response he expressed scepticism, describing the green / left alternative as a hopeless and dangerous attempt a libertarian decentralisation in an increasingly unstable, violent and threatening world.

 

He expressed Baudrilard’s view that Islamism was the most threatening reaction from the Third World in response to Globalism, that threatened to puncture the bubble of post modern liberal democracy.  While admitting that fascist Islamism was hardly widespread or politically potent, he described it in typically Baudrilarian style as a symbolic act of defiance that challenged the hegemony and confidence of the West.


An interesting ironic perspective on international relations, from the speakers Baudrillardian position, was that the Third World resents not the 'exploitation' of the West, but rather its 'charity'. This was based on the notion that the deep political economy is not rooted in an exchange ethic, but rather in an older (distorted?) gift economy. But here the ethic was one of prestige, a competitive gift giving in which those who gave the greatest gifts, and especially gifts which could not be returned with equivalence, have the higher status. This is also seen as the basis of consumerism by Baudrillarians. Thus those who cannot reciprocate are demeaned. However, as with most Baudrillarian ideas, many of us thought this an interesting half truth, and somewhat exaggerated. I felt it reflected a distorted idea of the notion of Gift, which in its pure form does not require reciprocation, though a likely distortion when in parallel economic relation to a market system.     

 

Almost xenophobically he also echoed his guru in the claim that the unassimilated Third World subcultures now existing in the West threatened its stability, a situation due to worsen as the wave of immigration from east to west increased, that was also
connected to the threat of Islamism.   

 

He concluded his apocalyptic vision with the bizarre and almost Gnostic views of Baudrilard that the world was naturally ‘evil’ in respect to our ‘humanist’ ideals and that fascism gained its strength from accepting this. He failed to elucidate what this meant however and was heavily pressed by the astonished audience to define himself.

The nearest he came to this was a kind of Dionysian concept of disruptiveness and the will to power that always undermined utopian ideals of peace, harmony and equality.

Few were convinced by this unworldly idealist position however. Most regarding what Baudrilard viewed as ‘evil’ as quite desirable.

 

One insightful point made was that 9/11 was actually subconsciously, and sometimes consciously, welcomed by many in the West, appealing to our secret taste for ‘evil’ and our deep awareness of the emptiness of our culture. This was evidenced in our fantasies of self destruction (given dubious democratic notions that we are our culture) it was suggested, such as certain disaster movies that prefigured the attack. This he claimed made us complicit in ‘terrorism’ and self undermining.   

 

He concluded on the pessimistic note that we were all essentially doomed.

 

To me this was an awful end to the series and one that seemed to potentiate the very fascist worldviews Alexander had earlier denounced. Many were unhappy with his assessment of the world situation, both his characterisation of the West as weak and indecisive (given the genuinely ‘terroristic’ American attacks on the Middle East) and his view that Islamism represented a real dynamic force, other than an artificial movement funded by the Saudis, upping their influence in the global power elite.

 

I was disappointed the series ended on this note, spoiling a good exploration of real issues with what amounted to pessimism fed by right wing propaganda.

  

 

Posted by Kao23 | 2 comment(s)

<< Back